Options to Robert’s Rules

Some men and women complain that Robert’s Regulations is too advanced to recognize. Some men and women say that parliamentary treatment itself is much too complex or way too unfair. They say the act of “creating motions” and the processing of “bulk vote” should not require a zillion rules.

Very well, guess what? It is not a monopoly. You can store close to.

If you do not like the current edition of Robert’s Procedures of Get (namely, the 11th edition revealed in 2011 which is titled “Robert’s Regulations of Order Freshly Revised”, printed by DaCapo Press), then your business is no cost to adopt one more competing parliamentary manual.

Without a doubt, in advance of 1876, the initially year of publication of the authentic edition of the minor pocket-sized e-book by Henry Martyn Robert, all organizations essentially had to draft their individual personalized established of parliamentary guidelines, for the reason that they had to – there was no neat, total compilation accessible to the typical civic organization. That tiny pocket-sized handbook of H. M. Robert filled a advertising and marketing specialized niche which had zero competition.

Or, your group can adopt no manual at all and draft their individual 100{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e} custom-made regulations. Which is proper – complete anarchy other than for whichever your bylaws specify furthermore whatsoever distinctive principles you develop yourselves. You can find practically nothing halting you from re-inventing the wheel – certainly, a 200-page, 300-page, 400-webpage “wheel,” dependent on how complete you want your tailored handbook to be. But do you really have 3 to 6 several years cost-free for these types of an undertaking?

If you really don’t want to commit 3-6 yrs drafting your own parliamentary handbook, and if you do not like the 700+ webpages of the recent version of Robert’s Principles, then what is the option? In which can you transform to for a established of democratic principles completely ready to be used? What real alternative is out there, right now, which can boost on, or can replace, Robert’s Regulations?

Fantastic news on this front: Somebody has taken a poll.

One particular parliamentarian, Jim Slaughter of North Carolina, wrote an short article (see footnote) which lists the most preferred choices to Robert’s Procedures. In his poll, he questioned working parliamentarians what parliamentary authority their customers had been working with. Slaughter’s findings had been as follows.

• 90{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e} use “Robert’s Policies of Order Recently Revised”
• 8{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e} use “The Common Code of Parliamentary Course of action”
• 3{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e} use some other parliamentary authority

Due to the fact #2 on the checklist is “The Normal Code of Parliamentary Technique” (abbreviated “TSC” for “The Typical Code”), then let us examine this book for its likely to swap Robert’s Policies.

The author of TSC was the late Alice F. Sturgis (1885-1974) who had some serious qualifications doing the job with the United Nations. She taught at Stanford College (Palo Alto, CA) and the University of California (Berkeley, CA). Her very first guide on parliamentary technique was posted in 1925. Immediately after the demise of Sturgis, the revision of the ebook has been in the palms of a committee of the American Institute of Parliamentarians. The present-day version is the 2000 4th edition.

Some massive corporations have taken the big move, and have swapped the Sturgis book for the Robert reserve: the American Bar Association, the American Health care Affiliation, the American Dental Association, and the United Automobile Workers Union.

What is various in the Sturgis book? To a non-parliamentarian reader, the policies in the current version of TSC could surface so equivalent to Robert’s Procedures that the dissimilarities are not evident. Without a doubt, any parliamentary handbook you choose must necessarily have a substantial overlap with all other parliamentary manuals, owing to the nature of 300 several years of British customs and traditions being handed on additional or a lot less intact to all democratically-elected legislatures. The basic principles have not altered in 2,000 decades. – (a.) Suggest an concept (b.) Discussion the advantages and disadvantages (c.) Vote irrespective of whether to have it out or not. The terminology has been furthermore preserved down by means of the centuries. Whatever differences exist will be concerning certain motions, particular apps, and not wholesale modifications.

What you get with the Sturgis’ TSC fourth version is pleasure for a several of the most popular requires around the 11th version of Robert’s Guidelines of Purchase: (a.) less webpages (b.) greater print (c.) much less motions (d.) transform of jargon to basic English.

No surprise below. A single detail you can count on is that today’s competitors to Robert’s Principles will have simplified something or condensed anything. That is, no just one is placing out a parliamentary handbook of far more web pages, additional regulations, than the existing version of Robert’s Rules, particularly, 716 numbered pages, and the reserve lists 86 numbered motions in its desk. How numerous of the 86 motions will you see in your lifetime?

Beware the big difference in philosophy. The Sturgis ebook, as well as all comparable condensations and simplifications, are meant to be understood as a e book of crucial rules, with concepts covering implicitly what the composed procedures do not protect explicitly. In distinction, the Robert e-book is meant to be encyclopedic is scope, and is meant to protect each and every contingency.

What does this imply? It indicates that if you adopt Sturgis or a similar simplification, then there will be parliamentary scenarios which the ebook is not going to cover. While, in distinction, it is very unlikely that any parliamentary condition you run into for the rest of your lifetime will not have a corresponding rule in Robert’s Policies of Order.

In this article is an analogy. — It is like the variance between a hybrid/electric automobile vs. a SUV/Humvee: One car or truck will little by little and frivolously get you from place A to point B, as very long as factors A & B aren’t much too significantly aside and aren’t much too steep. But the other car or truck is a monster truck, and there isn’t any place it are not able to go. — Which is the change involving a watered-down handbook which covers vital points, compared to an industrial-strength manual which addresses items you have hardly ever read of and under no circumstances will hear of.

That is why one particular reserve is 700+ internet pages long, and the competitiveness is 200-300 webpages long. The significant e book handles anything, and is intended to deal with 100{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e}. The lesser level of competition has deliberate gaps, and is intended to cover 50{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e}-80{a00e2a65948905ad150ce0b73b1a2569b7e687daf05a5ba82e14b7544a95be8e} of all scenarios — the simple kinds, the well known kinds, the non-intricate ones.

Listed here is another analogy using television as the medium: Robert’s Principles compared to any person else’s regulations is like the variance in amount of data amongst a motion picture trailer vs . the true movie. One consists of some seem bites, some highlights, and the main concept. The other incorporates each and every line of dialogue, each individual scene, and all themes and motifs.

Are there opponents to Sturgis? No, not truly. All the other competition are out of print. The paperback knock-offs that one particular may well discover in a search phrase research are not recognized by any business which I know of.

Nonetheless, if you are a fire fighter, then there is a reasonable possibility that your parliamentary manual is likely to be “Atwood’s Procedures for Meetings” (Roswell Atwood, 1956, released by the Worldwide Affiliation of Fireplace Fighters). Even more out of print than Atwood are older competition: George Demeter’s handbook. Franklin Kerfoot’s handbook. Thomas B. Reed’s handbook.

One much more substitute to weigh and take into consideration: Condition legislative properties use Mason’s manual (Paul Mason, most current edition 2010, posted by the Nationwide Convention of Point out Legislatures). But Mason is not a correct competitor to Robert or Sturgis mainly because Mason’s handbook is intended for full-time legislative bodies, and, as this sort of, these regulations won’t do the job for a the moment-a-month or after-for every-quarter fraternity clubhouse conference or a Very little League board or a pc club.

That is the situation. If you have reservations, fears, doubts, or fears, about mastering Robert’s Principles, or getting victimized by Robert’s Guidelines, then you do not have to choose it. You can communicate your organization into adopting a competitor, like “The Normal Code of Parliamentary Treatment,” or “Atwood’s Regulations for Conferences.” And if you you should not like Sturgis nor Atwood possibly, then you can cowboy-up and roll your own — indeed, draft your possess procedures of order, uniquely your have. All the inconsistencies and ambiguities will be of your own performing. Fantastic luck.

But be very careful what you wish for. If you never draft any principles, or if you draft too several policies, then you will be at the mercy of an untrained, unscrupulous chair with a concealed agenda, and you will not have any way of fighting back.

* * *

footnote:
Jim Slaughter, “Parliamentary Methods of CPP’s in 2000,” Parliamentary Journal, XLII (Jan. 2001), 1-11.

###